RESUMEN
Intermittent left bundle branch block (LBBB) is an unusual phenomenon, with very few cases documented in the literature. It is often considered a reflection of underlying conditions known to increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, and aortic valve disease. In rare instances, coronary vasospasm is the sole underlying condition. It is typically diagnosed by ECG and managed according to the underlying cause. We describe a case of intermittent LBBB presenting with chest pain. The ECG showed dynamic changes with transient/intermittent LBBB. An angiogram was performed, revealing significant coronary lesions. The patient was eventually managed conservatively and discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy for a duration of one year with a one-month clinic follow-up where his condition improved. Intermittent LBBB represents a transient disturbance in the intraventricular conduction system, where diseased conduction occurs secondary to an underlying cause, but normal conduction eventually restores. This results in complexes where LBBB appears alongside normally conducted beats in a single ECG tracing. There is limited knowledge about the prognosis of patients with intermittent LBBB; therefore, patients with LBBB should undergo careful evaluation due to the known association with serious cardiac pathologies, particularly cardiac ischemia. It is important to consider the potential adverse effects on ventricular function.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant challenges in clinical management, and intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide have become epicenters of high-stakes treatment decisions. Among these, corticosteroid therapy has risen as a pivotal, yet controversial, treatment modality. In Saudi Arabia, where unique demographic and health system characteristics intersect, understanding the specific effects of corticosteroids on ICU patient outcomes is not just critical but a pressing necessity in tailoring effective COVID-19 management strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elucidate the effects of corticosteroid therapy on the outcomes of severe COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabian ICUs, providing critical insights into treatment efficacy and guiding future clinical practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, we meticulously reviewed the medical records of 1085 severe COVID-19 patients admitted to Saudi Arabian ICUs. Our analysis focused on demographic details, ICU outcomes, and the extent and implications of corticosteroid therapy. The study employed comprehensive methods for data collection, evaluation criteria, and statistical analysis, ensuring a thorough understanding of the impact of corticosteroids in this context. RESULTS: The study encompassed 1085 patients, predominantly male (74.5%, N=806), with an average age of 56 and a mean BMI of 30.07. A significant portion (72.3%, N=784) received corticosteroid therapy. These patients generally experienced longer ICU (mean 23 days) and hospital stays (mean 16 days), along with higher rates of microbiological cure (72.3%, N=648) and increased ICU discharge likelihood. Conversely, corticosteroid recipients showed higher mortality rates at ICU discharge. The statistical analysis confirmed the significance of these findings, reinforcing their importance in managing COVID-19 in ICUs. CONCLUSION: The research highlights the intricate dynamics of corticosteroid use in treating severe COVID-19 cases in ICUs. While associated with prolonged ICU stays and increased mortality, corticosteroids also correlate with higher microbiological cure rates and discharge likelihood. These insights call for careful deliberation in applying corticosteroid therapy, with implications for enhancing clinical protocols and guiding future research in severe COVID-19 treatment.
RESUMEN
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to the global healthcare system, necessitating effective therapeutic strategies to mitigate its impact. This study investigates the significance of early antiviral therapy in the context of intensive care units (ICUs) and its potential to influence the progression and outcomes of severe COVID-19 cases. Methodology This retrospective cohort study leveraged a diverse patient population with confirmed severe COVID-19 admitted to ICUs. A total of 1,250 patients were included in the analysis, and their medical records were comprehensively reviewed. The study aimed to assess the impact of early antiviral therapy on patient outcomes, focusing on the administration of remdesivir within the first 48 hours of ICU admission. Results In a study of 1,250 COVID-19 patients, early antiviral therapy with remdesivir significantly reduced ICU admissions by 30% (N = 225) compared to standard care (N = 525). The early therapy group also exhibited a 20% lower mortality rate (N = 120) than the control group (N = 150). Demographic associations with antiviral usage were observed. Kaletra was favored by females, non-Saudi individuals, and healthcare workers, while favipiravir was associated with gender. Remdesivir and ribavirin use were linked to gender and Saudi nationality, while oseltamivir was related to gender, Saudi nationality, and body mass index. Microbiological cure rates were 15.4%, with 84.6% not achieving it. ICU outcomes included 37.7% deaths, 55.7% home discharges, and 6.6% transfers, while hospital outcomes featured 38.5% deaths, 54.4% home discharges, and 7.1% transfers. Conclusions This study presents a comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 patient demographics, antiviral medication associations, and clinical outcomes. The findings highlight the significance of tailoring treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and viral history. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of COVID-19 management and can inform clinical decision-making and further research in this field.
